New This Issue

Hello again. This issue I am sharing an excerpt from my latest book, Juice Alive: The Ultimate Guide to Juicing Remedies, which I had the pleasure of co-writing with Dr. Steven Bailey. Steven is one of the world’s foremost experts on juicing and our book is, if I may say so, the best of its kind. Not only does it cover all aspect of juicing, including the history of juicing through the ages, it also contains more than 300 juice remedies for well over 100 of the most common health conditions. Plus it contains recipes for healthy smoothies and tonics. I really hope you will seek it out.

Also in this issue are two articles that make clear the influence Big Pharma has over the FDA, which corrupts the FDA’s mission at our expense. You’ll also find the conclusion to the article I began last issue on the terrible “medical” experiments carried out by the US Government on its own citizens.
 
As always, please continue to send me your comments and suggestions. And please spread the word about The Health Plus Letter by passing it along to your friends and inviting them to subscribe.


Quote Of The Day

“This ‘I and mine’ causes the whole misery.”
— Vivekananda

Fast Fact

Most people in the US and other Western nations fail to obtain 75 percent of the established recommended daily allowances (RDAs) for minerals, according to research conducted by the National Institutes of Health (NIH).


Unabashed Plug

Learn the Truth about Heart Disease, Stroke and Hypertension. Most of what conventional medicine has to offer for treating these conditions is based on faulty and potentially dangerous assumptions. Discover the real causes behind these diseases and learn what you can do today to prevent and reverse them using safe and natural alternatives that have been scientifically proven to be effective. Read the critically-acclaimed eBook Burton Goldberg’s Definitive Guide to Heart Disease, featuring the contributions of Dr. Garry Gordon, Dr. Stephen Sinatra, and many other leading heart specialists. To order or to find out more about this potentially lifesaving guide, visit http://www.1healthyworld.com/ebooks/Heart-Book-Info.cfm.


A Secret History of  Sinister “Medical” Experiments Conducted by the U.S. Government (Part 2)

Here is a continuation of last issue’s article documenting the criminal and sordid “medical” experiments conducted by elements of the US. Government against its own people, all in the name of “the greater good.” The fact that they did should be all the caution we need to never take our government officials at their word. Always seeks confirmation of what they say. (Part 1 of this article is available at http://www.1healthyworld.com/ezine/vol5no1.cfm)

1965: CIA and Department of Defense begin Project MKSEARCH, a program to develop a capability to manipulate human behavior through  the use of mind-altering drugs.

1965: Prisoners at the Holmesburg State Prison in Philadelphia are subjected to dioxin, the highly toxic chemical component of Agent Orange used in Viet Nam. The men are later studied for development of cancer, which indicates that Agent Orange had been a suspected carcinogen all along.

1966: CIA initiates Project MKOFTEN, a program to test the toxicological effects of certain drugs on humans and animals.

1966: U.S. Army dispenses Bacillus subtilis variant niger throughout the New York City subway system. More than a million civilians are exposed when army scientists drop lightbulbs filled with the bacteria onto ventilation grates.

1967: CIA and Department of Defense implement Project MKNAOMI, successor to MKULTRA and designed to maintain, stockpile and test biological and chemical weapons.

1968: CIA experiments with the possibility of poisoning drinking water by injecting chemicals into the water supply of the FDA in Washington, D.C.

1969: Dr. Robert MacMahan of the Department of Defense requests from Congress $10 million to develop, within 5 to 10 years, a synthetic biological agent to which no natural immunity exists.

1970: Funding for the synthetic biological agent is obtained under H.R. 15090. The project, under the supervision of the CIA, is carried out by the Special Operations Division at Fort Detrick, the army's top-secret biological weapons facility. Speculation is raised that molecular biology techniques are used to produce AIDS-like retroviruses.

1970: United States intensifies its development of "ethnic weapons" (Military Review, Nov., 1970), designed to selectively target and eliminate specific ethnic groups who are susceptible due to genetic differences and variations in DNA.

1975: The virus section of Fort Detrick's Center for Biological Warfare Research is renamed the Fredrick Cancer Research Facilities and placed under the supervision of the National Cancer Institute (NCI). [You can't make this stuff up!- LT] It is here that a special virus cancer program is initiated by the U.S. Navy, purportedly to develop cancer-causing viruses. It is also here that retrovirologists isolate  virus to which no immunity exists. It is later named HTLV (Human  T-cell Leukemia Virus).
1977: Senate hearings on Health and Scientific Research confirm that 239 populated areas had been contaminated with biological agents between 1949 and 1969. Some of the areas included San Francisco, Washington, D.C., Key West, Panama City, Minneapolis, and St. Louis.

1978: Experimental Hepatitis B vaccine trials, conducted by the CDC, begin in New York, Los Angeles and San Francisco. Ads for research subjects specifically ask for promiscuous homosexual men.

1981: First cases of AIDS are confirmed in homosexual men in New York, Los Angeles and San Francisco, triggering speculation that AIDS may have been introduced via the Hepatitis B vaccine.

1985: According to the journal Science (227:173-177), HTLV and VISNA, a fatal sheep virus, are very similar, indicating a close taxonomic and evolutionary relationship.

1986: According to the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (83:4007-4011), HIV and VISNA are highly similar and share all structural elements, except for a small segment which is nearly identical to HTLV. This leads to speculation that HTLV and VISNA may have been linked to produce a new retrovirus to which no natural immunity exists.

1986: A report to Congress reveals that the U.S. Government's current generation of biological agents includes: modified viruses, naturally-occurring toxins, and agents that are altered through genetic engineering to change immunological character and prevent treatment by all existing vaccines.

1987: Department of Defense admits that, despite a treaty banning research and development of biological agents, it continues to operate research facilities at 127 facilities and universities around the nation.

1990: More than 1500 six-month old black and hispanic babies in Los Angeles are given an "experimental" measles vaccine that had never been  licensed for use in the United States. CDC later admits that parents were never informed that the vaccine being injected to their children was experimental.

1994: With a technique called "gene tracking," Dr. Garth Nicolson at the MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, TX discovers that many returning Desert Storm veterans are infected with an altered strain of Mycoplasma incognitus, a microbe commonly used in the production of biological weapons. Incorporated into its molecular structure is 40 percent of the HIV protein coat, indicating that it had been man-made.

1994: Senator John D. Rockefeller issues a report revealing that for at least 50 years the Department of Defense has used hundreds of thousands of military personnel in human experiments and for intentional exposure to dangerous substances. Materials included mustard and nerve gas, ionizing radiation, psychochemicals, hallucinogens, and drugs used during the Gulf War.

1995: U.S. Government admits that it had offered Japanese war criminals and scientists who had performed human medical experiments salaries and immunity from prosecution in exchange for data on biological warfare research.

1995: Dr. Garth Nicolson, uncovers evidence that the biological agents used during the Gulf War had been manufactured in Houston, TX and Boca Raton, Fl and tested on prisoners in the Texas Department of Corrections.

1996: Department of Defense admits that Desert Storm soldiers were exposed to chemical agents.

1997: Eighty-eight members of Congress sign a letter demanding an investigation into bioweapons use and Gulf War Syndrome.

For more information on this subject, here is a list of articles, along with corresponding website links:

Alliance for Human Research Protection. "'Monster Experiment' Taught Orphans to Stutter.". June 11, 2001.

Barker, Allen. "The Cold War Experiments." Mind Control.

Berdon, Victoria. "Codes of Medical and Human Experimentation Ethics." The Least of My Brothers.

Brinker, Wendy. "James Marion Sims: Father Butcher." Seed Show.

Burton Report. "Human Experimentation, Plutonium and Col. Stafford Warren."

Cockburn, Alexander and Jeffrey St. Clair, eds. "Germ War: The U.S. Record." Counter Punch.

"Donald Ewan [sic] Cameron." Wikipedia.

Doran, Jamie. "Guinea Pig Kids." BBC News. 30 Nov. 2004.

Drug Development-Technology.com. "SFBC."

Elliston, Jon. "MKULTRA: CIA Mind Control." Dossier: Paranormal Government.

Environmental Working Group. "U.S.: Lockheed Martin's Tests on Humans." CorpWatch.

Global Security. Chemical Corps. 2005.

Goliszek, Andrew. In the Name of Science. New York: St. Martin's, 2003.

Greger, Michael, M.D. Heart Failure: Diary of a Third Year Medical Student.

Griffiths, Joel and Chris Bryson. "Toxic Secrets: Fluoride and the Atom Bomb." Nexus Magazine 5:3. Apr. - May 1998.

Hammer Breslow, Lauren. "The Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act of 2002: The Rise of the Voluntary Incentive Structure and Congressional Refusal to Require Pediatric Testing." Harvard Journal of Legislation Vol. 40.

"Human Experimentation: Before the Nazi Era and After." Micah Books. 

Kaye, Jonathan. "Retin-A's Wrinkled Past." Mind Control. Orig. pub. Penn History Review Spring 1997.

Meiklejohn, Gordon N., M.D. "Commission on Influenza." Histories of the Commissions.

Ed. Theodore E. Woodward, M.D. The Armed Forced Epidemiological Board. 1994.

Merritte, LaTasha, et al.. "The Banality of Evil: Human Medical Experimentation in the United States." The Public Law Online Journal. Spring 1999. 

New York City Administration of Children's Services. Press release. 22 Apr. 2005.

"Operation Whitecoat." Religion and Ethics (Episode no. 708). Oct. 24, 2003.

Pacchioli, David. Subjected to Science. Mar. 1996.

"Project Paperclip." Wikipedia. 2005.

"Reviews and Notes: History of Medicine: Subjected to Science: Human Experimentation in America before the Second World War." Annals of Internal Medicine 123:2. July 15, 1995. 

Sharav, Vera Hassner. "Human Experiments: A Chronology of Human Rsearch." Alliance for Human Research Protection.

"Testimony of Adil E. Shamoo, Ph.D." News from the Joint Hearing on Suspension of Medical Research at West Los Angeles and Sepulveda VA Medical Facilities and Informed Consent and Patient Safety in VA Medical Research. 21 Apr. 1999. 

University of New Hampshire. "Chronology of Cases Involving Unethical Treatment of Human Subjects." Responsible Conduct of Research. 

University of Virginia Health System Health Sciences Library. "Bad Blood: The Tuskegee Syphilis Study." 2004.

U.S. Department of Energy. "Chapter 8: Postwar TBI-Effects Experimentation: Continued Reliance on Sick Patients in Place of Healthy "Normals." Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments (ACHRE) Final Report.

Veterans Health Administration. Project 112/Project SHAD. May 26, 2005. 

Willen, Liz and David Evans. "Doctor Who Died in Drug Test Was Betrayed by System He Trusted." Bloomberg. Nov. 2, 2005.

"Parents of Babies Who Died in Delaware Tests Weren't Warned." Bloomberg. Nov. 2, 2005.


How the FDA Works

“People think the FDA is protecting them. It isn't. What the FDA is doing and what the public thinks it's doing are as different as night and day. First, it is providing a means whereby key individuals on its payroll are able to obtain both power and wealth through granting special favors to certain politically influential groups that are the subject of its regulation. This activity is similar to the 'protection racket' of organized crime: for a price, one can induce FDA administrators to provide protection from the FDA itself.

“Secondly, as a result of political favoritism, the FDA has become a primary factor in that formula whereby cartel-oriented companies in the food and drug industry are able to use the police powers of the government to harass or destroy their free-market competitors.

“And thirdly, the FDA occasionally does some genuine public good with whatever energies it has left over after serving the vested political and commercial interest of its first two activities.”

The above statement was made by Herbert Ley, former FDA Commissioner, at the 1965 Edward Long US Senate hearings and reprinted in the San Francisco Chronicle on Jan. 2, 1970. Since then, as the next article revelas, things have only gotten worse.


Taking Back the FDA by Marcia Angell, MD

[This article highlights the conflict-of-interest relationship that exists between Big Pharma and the FDA, and explains why it is in place. Note that the 1992 legislation mentioned below was passed at a time when Democrats controlled Congress and when Clinton was president. This fact indicates that Big Pharma benefits equally from both sides of the political aisle. Also note, that Dr. Anegll’s proposed solution to this problem is unlikely to solve the problem, given the longer history of collusion between the FDA and Big Pharma that Commissioner Ley exposed in the statement above. – LT]

It's time to take the Food and Drug Administration back from the drug companies.

Before a prescription drug can be sold, the manufacturer must conduct clinical trials to prove to the FDA that the drug is safe and effective. Without that, doctors have no way of knowing how good or bad a drug is. Just trying it out would be not only risky, but unreliable, since individual experience can be misleading. The scrutiny that this agency exists to provide is vital to our health.

But in 1992, Congress put the fox in the chicken coop. It passed the Prescription Drug User Fee Act, which authorizes drug companies to pay "user fees" to the FDA for each brand-name drug considered for approval. Nearly all of the money generated by these fees has been earmarked to speed up the approval process.

In effect, the user fee act put the FDA on the payroll of the industry it regulates. Last year, the fees came to about $300 million, which the companies recoup many times over by getting their drugs to market faster.

But while it's a small investment for drug companies, it's a lot of money for the agency, and it has drastically changed the way it operates -- creating a disproportionate emphasis on approving brand-name drugs in a hurry. Consequently, the part of the agency that reviews new drugs gets more than half its money from user fees, and it has grown rapidly. Meanwhile, the parts that monitor safety, ensure manufacturing standards, and check ads for accuracy have languished or even shrunk.

Most tellingly, the office that approves generic drugs is so small that approval time for generics is twice as long as for brand-name drugs. There is now a backlog of more than 800 generics. That delay is worth billions of dollars to the drug companies whose high prices depend on not having generic competition.

As part of the emphasis on speed, the FDA often approves brand-name drugs on the basis of less evidence than in the past. In these cases, approval may be contingent on companies conducting further safety studies after the drugs are on the market. But the companies usually don't honor that commitment. Of the roughly 1,200 such studies outstanding -- some for years -- over 70 percent haven't been started.

The FDA is strangely silent about this inexcusable dereliction. When questioned, it weakly protests that it doesn't have the authority to compel the research. In fact, it has enormous leverage, since it can withdraw drugs from the market.

The FDA also refuses to release unfavorable research results in its possession without the sponsoring company's permission. Here again, it contends not to have the authority to do so, but providing evidence of side-effects or negative results would seem to be an integral part of its job. It's no wonder that serious safety concerns about drugs such as Vioxx, Paxil, and Zyprexa have emerged very late in the day -- years after they were in widespread use.

The agency's coziness with industry is underscored by the composition of its 18 advisory committees -- outside experts who help evaluate drugs.

Incredibly, many of these advisers work as consultants for drug companies. Although they are supposed to recuse themselves if there is a direct conflict of interest, the FDA regularly grants exemptions from that requirement. Of the six members of the advisory committee that in 1999 recommended approving Vioxx -- the arthritis drug pulled from the market in 2004 because it caused heart attacks -- four had received waivers from the conflict-of-interest rule.

The FDA now behaves as though the pharmaceutical industry is its user, not the public. Fortunately, the user fee law is subject to renewal every five years, and this is one of those years.

Congress should let the law die this time around and substitute its own support -- which ought to be increased. Other reforms recently proposed, such as administratively separating drug approval from safety surveillance, will not mean much as long as this law is in effect.

At $300 million to $400 million a year, the equivalent of about a day in Iraq, Congress can easily afford to buy this vital agency back for the public, and it should.

Dr. Marcia Angell, a senior lecturer at Harvard Medical School, is the author of The Truth About the Drug Companies: How They Deceive Us and What To Do About It and former editor-in-chief of the New England Journal of Medicine.

This article originally appeared in the Boston Globe on February 26, 2007. Copyright © The Boston Globe. All rights reserved.


THE IMPORTANCE OF EATING ORGANIC FOODS by Steven Bailey, ND and Larry Trivieri, Jr

Although government agencies and certain scientific groups continue to insist that organically raised foods are not inherently healthier and more nutritious than nonorganic foods, their arguments are hollow and without merit. In this section, we will explain why. To begin, we must define what the term organic actually means.

Simply put, organic foods is the term used to describe foods that are grown and harvested without the use of manmade fertilizers, pesticides,fungicides, preservatives, and other harmful chemicals. In the United States, foods can be designated as organic if they are grown in soil that has been free of synthetic chemicals for at least five years. (Some farms which have shifted to the production of organic foods but have not been free of synthetic chemicals for five years are known as transitional organic farms, since chemical residues can usually still be found in their croplands, and therefore in the fruits and vegetables that are grown in it.)

This definition of organic is inherently limited, however, since it fails to recognize that foods that are truly organic are far more than foods that are free of manmade chemicals. Rather, they are foods that supply a more complete balance of nutrients as nature intended. As a result, they are healthier for you, compared to nonorganic foods, as well as being tastier.

Yet none of these factors are truly considered by federal regulatory agencies such as the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which are primarily concerned only with the presence or absence of synthetic chemical residues and not with evaluating the nutritional quality of organic and nonorganic foods. In fact, both the USDA and FDA claim organic and nonorganic foods are nutritionally equivalent, yet neither agency takes into account the differences that exist in the mineral and trace mineral content of organic and nonorganic produce. Crop soil loaded with synthetic chemicals is noticeably deficient in minerals and trace minerals compared to soil unburdened by such chemicals. Since the overall mineral content in soil directly affects the overall nutrient content of crops that are grown in it, this means that organic crop soil yields produce that is more abundant in minerals and trace minerals, as well as vitamins, enzymes, phytonutrients, and other important nutritional factors.

Further distinguishing organic foods from nonorganic foods is the alarming impact that nonorganic, commercial farming methods have on crop soil itself, compared to croplands that are farmed organically. Organic farm methods not only maintain topsoil, but in many cases they actually increase it, resulting in healthier and more nutritious produce. By contrast, nonorganic farming methods result in a loss of topsoil, further devitalizing the foods grown in such soil. In addition, chemical fertilizers, fungicides, and pesticides severely damage organisms in crop soil that are essential for the absorption of soil nutrients by plants. This negatively impacts the health of plants grown in such soil, as well as reducing the plants’ nutrient content.

Nonorganic farming methods also pose threats to our health, as well. In addition to reducing the amount and variety of nutrients that are obtained by us when we eat nonorganic foods, they also expose us to the chemical residues such food crops contain. Once such foods are consumed, the residues they contain find their way to fatty tissues and the fat cells of our bodies, where they are stored, causing a variety of toxic side effects. For example, there is now overwhelming evidence that pesticides stored in human tissues trigger increased rates of hormone-related cancers such as breast and prostate cancer due to their ability to disrupt normal functioning of the body’s endocrine system, which is in charge of hormone regulation.

A more recent health threat posed by nonorganic farming methods has to do with produce that has been genetically modified due to the inclusion of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Just as the USDA and FDA continue to insist that there is no discernible difference between organic and nonorganic food groups, both agencies also maintain that GMO foods are identical to and as safe as natural foods. But this claim has never been fully established by thorough scientific investigation. In addition, according to a survey of field-tested GMO food crops conducted by researcher of the Union Of Concerned Scientists, 93 percent of the genetic changes made to food crops are not made in order to produce nutrient content or taste, but merely to increase the profitability of commercial agriculture companies by making food production easier and less expensive.Unfortunately, these intended benefits have often failed to materialize. For these and other reasons, despite ongoing pressure by the United States to change their stance, the health and agricultural ministries of many countries within the European Union currently are resisting introducing GMOs into their nations’ food chain because of the many unanswered questions regarding GMOs and health and safety.

There have already been identified risks associated with GMO foods. While the FDA does not require independent safety tests to be conducted, even with animals, on the GMO foods, there have been animal and human findings that are alarming. The first GMO tomato underwent animal studies by its developer. Ironically the rats in the study would not eat the tomatoes. They ended up force-feeding the rats, resulting in the rats having a 35 percent incidence of gastroenteritis and a 17 percent fatality rate. The FDA still approved this tomato for humans.  Other animals have been observed refusing to eat GMO corn and in Norway, extensive research on rats fed GMO foods revealed the new genes in all organs. Similar identification of GMO genes entering gut bacterium has been shown in the normal flora of humans.

Dr. Bailey has personally visited facilities that conduct genetic engineering to interview genetic scientists involved in GMO research. He has also spoken to FDA officials about GMO technology. He came away unimpressed with any of the arguments made by scientists and regulatory officials in support of GMO foods. As he wrote in his book The Fasting Diet, “The discussions have been of such limited scope that true evaluation of [the] impact [of GMOs] is beyond their review and beyond their current knowledge.”

To avoid including GMO foods in your diet, choose to buy only organic foods. In addition, beware of using canned foods, even if they claim to be organic. Corn is one of the primary ingredients found in most canned foods and, unfortunately, due to the clout of chemical giants such as Monsanto, our federal government has allowed GMO corn to be widely introduced into our nation’s farmlands. As a result, today an estimated 95 percent of all corn grown in the United States contains GMOs.Many people working within the food industry will tell you that there are no GMO foods used in their product; unfortunately, only letters of certification can be trusted.

[Excerpted from Juice Alive: The Ultimate Guide to Juicing Remedies by Steven Bailey, ND and Larry Trivieri, Jr, available at your local bookstore and online at www.amazon.com, and www.bn.com (Barnes & Noble).]

Unabashed Plug

Protect Yourself From Energy Pollution With the BioElectric Shield^TM. Energy pollution is all around us in the fo/rm of harmful electromagnetic frequencies and radiation (EMFs and EMR) emitted by power lines, cells phones, computers, and many other so-called modern conveniences. By wearing the BioElectric Shield pendant, you can protect yourself from the harmful effects of EMFs and EMR. To obtain a BioElectricShield, visit http://www.mcssl.com/app/aftrack.asp?afid=408491. To learn more about how and why the BioElectric Shield works, see my article about it at http://www.1healthyworld.com/ezine/vol4no9.cfm.


Recommendations

Books:
Confessions of An Economic Hitman by John Perkins. Last issue, I recommended a video interview with Perkins, who spent much of his life as a self-described “economic hitman” who worked to saddle foreign nations with debt they could never repay so that their natural resources would default into the control of US corporations. Since then, I;ve read Perkins’ book and highly recommend that you do too.

The Armed Madhouse by Greg Palast. How bad are things becoming in the U.S.? Read this book if you want to find out.
 
Websites:
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17136.htm - this link will take you to a probing look at how extensively private contractors are profiting from the so-called “war on terror.” It also makes clear that your tax dollars aren’t going where you think they are. As Taylor Caldwell wrote decades ago in her brilliant novel Captains and the Kings, “government of the people, for the people, by the people” no longer exists, having long ago given way to “government of the money, for the money, by the money.”

http://www.holoscience.com/news.php?article=8gfbewe7 - Here you will find an excellent summary about the actual primary cause of global warming in an article that debunks the Al Gore version.

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/021907G.shtml - This article is a must read for anyone who wants to know about the chilling health effects of depleted uranium (DU), which has been used by the US military since the first Gulf War, wrecking havoc not only on innocent Iraqi civilians, but also many in the US military. Although this article does not discuss it, I’ve also read other articles that show that DU, once released into the atmosphere, eventually is carried around the globe by wind currents. Evidence suggests that it has for years been settling in the US, accounting for the rise of lung cancer not due to smoking and/or asbestos exposure. Evidence also suggests that DU in the US environment is also partly to blame for the rise in Type-2 diabetes. The use of DU is another example of the hypocrisy of our leadership (both Democrats and Republicans) who always use the phrase “weapons of mass destruction” to justify our nations’ various illegal attacks on sovereign nations. For there is no disputing the fact that there is no justification whatsoever for the use of DU, even by the standards of war.
 
Unabashed Plug

Discover and Gain Control of Your Human Energy Field. Read Dr. Valerie Hunt’s Mind Mastery Meditations: A Workbook for the “Infinite Mind,” the empowering guide created by one of the world's foremost researchers into the human energy field, energy medicine, and the relationship between consciousness and health. Each of the meditations this eBook contains is designed to give you mastery of your mind and to empower you to discover the answers to why you are the way you are, your soul's needs, your unique talents and capacities, and your self-designed destiny. By practicing and mastering these meditations, you will become able to live your life with greater ease and success, speed your self-healing, and dramatically increase your ability to manifest your deepest goals. To order this life-changing guide, visit
http://www.1healthyworld.com/ebooks/Mind-Mastery-Book-Info.cfm.


Medical F/r/e/edom

Please contact and support the following organizations dedicated to protecting our health freedoms.
 
Citizens for Health - http://www.citizens.org

Alliance for Natural Health – http://www.alliance-natural-health.org (The leading organization fighting to preserve health f/r/e/edom in England and the EU.)

Institute for Health F/r/e/edom – http://www.ForHealthF/r/e/edom.org

International Advocates for Health F/r/e/edom (IAHF) – http://www.iahf.com

And to learn how corrupt and extensive Big Pharma’s monopoly is, visit http://www.pnc.com.au/~cafmr/online/research/index.html the website for the Campaign Against Fraudulent Medical Research. In particular, read their in-depth report The Pharmaceutical Drug Racket that you will find th/e/re.


That’s all for this week.

Health and Blessings!

Larry Trivieri, Jr. (larry@1healthyworld.com)

Disclaimer: The Health Plus Letter is a weekly eZine published by Larry Trivieri, Jr. and Library of Health, LLC (dba www.1healthyworld.com) 1514 Genesee Street, Suite 52, Utica, NY 13502. It is made available without charge for info/rmation purposes only and is not intended as a substitute for medical care. If you are experiencing a health problem, seek prompt medical attention.