|
Gordon Research Institute
Garry F. Gordon, MD, DO, MD(H), President 600 N Beeline Hwy, Suite B, Payson, AZ 85541 OFFICE: (928) 472-4263 FAX: (928) 474-3819 www.gordonresearch.com Click here to e-mail Dr. Gordon |
|
By Michael Adams Executive Director, Consumer Wellness Research Center A new study conducted by the Institute of Clinical Evaluative
Sciences, a health care research organization in Toronto, has concluded
that a prescription drug commonly prescribed for congestive heart failure
is now responsible for an increased number of deaths of heart patients
due to the drug being more widely prescribed by doctors. The drug, called spironolactone, first looked promising
five years ago when studies showed that it decreased the death rate by
30% in people with serious heart failure. But following that study, doctors
started widely prescribing the drug, and as a result, the drug has caused
an estimated 4,200 deaths in the United States and 37,000 more hospitalizations
each year. Possible explanations for this are that the doctors have been
prescribing the drug in doses that were too high, or they were prescribing
it to people with other illnesses -- such as diabetes or kidney disorders
-- that exaggerate the toxic side effects of the drugs. So here we have a prescription drug that is estimated
to be killing thousands of people and hospitalizing tens of thousands,
which places it in a category that makes it far more dangerous than any
herb or natural approach to healing. So what does modern medicine have
to say about this drug? One of the researchers involved in this research
actually defended the drug saying, "I have no doubt that in the right
patients and with careful monitoring that this is still a good drug combination."
Once again, let's contrast this with what would have happened
if this were an herb. If this were an herbal medicine and it were found
to be responsible for 73 deaths and 37,000 hospitalizations, the FDA would
have been screaming national warnings about it and shutting down the company
responsible for manufacturing the herb. Doctors would have engaged in
a unanimous outcry about how toxic the herb was and how it was killing
people and should be immediately banned from the marketplace. Courts would
be demanding that the herbal manufacturer pay back any revenues generated
from the product, and the inventory of the product would be confiscated
by the FDA. That's what would have happened if it were an herb, but
of course, it's not a herb, it's a prescription drug. So in this case,
modern medicine rushes to the rescue, saying the drug is perfectly safe
when used with some people; it just needs to be more closely monitored
in other patients. In other words, it's okay that this drug is killing
people -- it's a pharmaceutical, and all pharmaceuticals are allowed to
kill a certain number of people and injure tens of thousands without raising
any sort of alarm at the FDA or the pharmaceutical manufacturer. That's the way things are today with western medicine
-- pharmaceuticals can exist as highly toxic -- even fatal -- chemicals
that actually kill patients, and yet be perfectly justified by medical
doctors and even continue to be prescribed. Meanwhile, natural remedies
and herbs are yanked off the market with great fanfare, even when they
can only be loosely associated with a handful of deaths (as was the case
with ephedra, also known as ma huang, an herb used in traditional Chinese
medicine). That idea is ridiculous -- it is the drug that is causing the potassium problem, not the herbal remedy that is interfering with the drug. So often in modern medicine, doctors warn about herbal medicines interfering with prescriptions, but they never warn about prescription drugs interfering with herbal medicines, nor do they warn about prescription drugs interfering with normal, healthy human metabolism in the first place, and that's where the toxic side effects arise, and that's why prescription drugs are now known to kill -- yes, to kill -- 100,000 Americans each year, even when used as directed. |
|
|